This is a sponsored article from Vanguard.
The investment world has embraced factor-based strategies in recent years as their popularity has soared and a rapidly growing and diverse array of product offerings has emerged.
As the range of offerings expands, however, so too does the number of myths and misconceptions surrounding factor-based investing, not least because of the lack of clear definitions. Different investors have different interpretations of how factors are identified and they may have a different understanding of how factors have performed historically or on how to approach multifactor strategies.
Vanguard – one of the biggest players in factor investing servicing more than 20 million clients worldwide, including large institutions and banks – has drawn on its extensive expertise to cut through the clutter and debunk five common myths about factor investing.
MYTH 1: All documented factors are good factors
REALITY: Currently, there are more than 300 documented factor characteristics but not all of them benefit investors and therefore cannot be described as good factors. To qualify as such, a factor must meet three central criteria:
- A factor must display an enduring, logical rationale for investing either on a risk-based or behaviour-based basis.
- A factor’s investment potential must be supported by solid empirical evidence such as out-of-sample tests or academic studies.
- A factor must be investable and the reward must be worth the risk once implementation costs are taken into account.
Based on these three core principles, Vanguard focuses on five of the best-known factors: value, momentum, quality, liquidity, and minimum volatility — all of which meet or exceed the criteria and have demonstrated outperformance historically. Investors still need to do their due diligence on not just why a factor worked in the past but whether it has good rationale to work in the future.
MYTH 2: Factor investing can be timed
REALITY: In factor investing, outperformance and underperformance both occur periodically across different market cycles.
Like other forms of active management, the performance of equity factor tilts relative to the broad market is difficult to predict, particularly in the short term. Since the relative performance of equity factor tilts varies over time, it is difficult to profit from these swings through market timing. As the wide performance dispersion indicates, a high degree of uncertainty is associated with the relative performance of equity factor tilts in any particular market, economic, and monetary policy condition (Chart 1). The challenge of forecasting what the environment will be, when it will occur, and how factors will act as a result is notoriously difficult. Using factors successfully requires discipline and a degree of flexibility.
Chart 1: Performance in different environments has been unpredictable
Value factor tilt (1975-2016)
MYTH 3: Factors will always outperform
REALITY: Even factors with the greatest historical performance and the strongest rationale for future expected performance can go through significant periods of underperformance. For example, each equity factor amongst value, size, momentum, quality, liquidity, and volatility has underperformed by at least 7 percentage points relative to the broad market over a 12-month period, potentially challenging the conviction of even the most patient investors to stay the course.
Investors have tended to sell active investments that underperform over shorter periods, but expectations need to be tempered with a long-term focus. It is therefore critical for investors to decide in advance if they have the willingness, ability, and time horizon to cope with inevitable periods of relatively poor performance.
MYTH 4: Using multiple factors dilutes potential performance
REALITY: While using multiple factors seldom leads to absolute top performance, combining factors with low correlation of excess returns provides a smoother ride through diversification and market turbulence while maintaining the ability to capture potential excess returns over time and improve risk-adjusted returns.
Given the significant active performance cyclicality of single equity factors, the diversification benefits associated with multiple factor tilts have historically been reasonably strong as the active risk can potentially be reduced by holding a combination of factors.
MYTH 5: A top-down approach is the only strategy for multifactor investing
REALITY: The most appropriate approach for each investor should be based on their individual objectives, constraints, preferences, due-diligence capabilities, and belief sets.
In the top-down approach, factor exposure is determined via vehicle selection, with each vehicle targeting a specific factor. This gives the investor flexibility to decide which factors to include in each vehicle and their weighting, the asset manager for each factor, as well as the allocation of each single-factor vehicle.
By contrast, according to the bottom-up approach, factor exposures are determined through security selection, with portfolios based on the combined factor exposures of individual stocks. A stock with a moderate sensitivity to several chosen factors is more likely to be selected in a bottom-up portfolio than a stock with a high sensitivity to just one factor but poor sensitivity to the other(s). This approach ensures chosen stocks are not inadvertently tilted against any of the targeted factors.
While research shows that both multifactor approaches exhibit historical outperformance, the bottom-up approach has tended to produce better long-term results for investors who plan to hold their factor exposures for a longer period.
Not all factors are created equal, but by cultivating discipline, flexibility, and enough patience to stay the course, investors can increase the potential for excess returns over the long term with factor usage.
For more on factor investing, visit www.vanguard.com.hk/factor investing.
This material is for distribution to “Professional Investors” (as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571 of the laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made under that ordinance) only. It is not intended for and should not be distributed to, or relied upon, by members of the public or retail investors in Hong Kong.
Investment involves risks, including the loss of principal. Investors are advised to consider their own investment objectives and circumstances in determining the suitability of an investment in the fund(s). Past performance is not indicative of future performance. If you are in any doubt, you should seek professional advice.
In Singapore: This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this document and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor pursuant to Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”) or (ii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
The contents of this document and any attachments/links contained in this document are for general information only and are not advice. The information does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs and is not designed as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek independent professional advice regarding the suitability of an investment product, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs before making an investment.
The contents of this document and any attachments/links contained in this document have been prepared in good faith. Please note that the information may have become outdated since its publication, and any information sourced from third parties is not necessarily endorsed by The Vanguard Group, Inc., and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, the “Vanguard Entities”).
This document contains links to materials which may have been prepared in the United States and which may have been commissioned by the Vanguard Entities. They are for your information and reference only and they may not represent our views. The materials may include incidental references to products issued by the Vanguard Entities.
The information contained in this document does not constitute an offer or solicitation and may not be treated as an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law, or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation, or if the person making the offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so. The Vanguard Entities may be unable to facilitate investment for you in any products which may be offered by the Vanguard Group, Inc.
No part of this document or any attachments/links contained in this document may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written consent from the Vanguard Entities. Any attachments and any information in the links contained in this document may not be detached from this document and/or be separately made available for distribution.
This document is being made available in Hong Kong by Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited (CE No. : AYT820) (“Vanguard Hong Kong”). The contents of this document have not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.
Copyright, trademark and other forms of proprietary rights protect the contents of this document. You may not copy, publish and/or distribute any derivative works from the information from this document.
© 2018 Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited
All rights reserved.
This is a sponsored article from Vanguard.