Private banks may want to reconsider the risks of taking up the duo roles of an investment advisor and trustee, in view of the recent case concerning residual fiduciary obligations toward clients. While it is common for universal banks to have a trustee entity to cater to the wealth planning needs of wealthy clients, the recent Zhang Hong Li v…
Looming judgment on ‘residual obligation’ puts spotlight on conflict of interest for PBs’ trusteeships
14 October 2019

Share article
Share article
Related News

Standard Chartered appoints new PB head for India
15 July 2022

Movers & Shakers – Private banks turn more selective as 2H22 looms
21 June 2022

Fidelity taps rising private assets interest with Moonfare deal
24 May 2022

Exclusive
Thematics AM captures growing interest in metaverse with thematic fund launches
12 April 2022

“We don’t believe in advisory”: Why Leo Wealth puts DPM at its core
11 April 2022

Crypto unlikely to go mainstream with PBs despite interest from wealthy clients
17 March 2022

Movers & Shakers – Feb 2022: More RMs in Singapore prefer to stay put after bonus due to uncertainties ahead
11 March 2022

Here is what the Russia-Ukraine conflict means for private clients’ portfolios
25 February 2022